<body> <body>

Wednesday, January 17, 2007
♥ Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Social Awareness. One huge hurdle to cross.

My bro blogged one about emotions. Now for the sheer excitement of argument, somewhat inspired by yesterday's titillating encounter of MGS vs St Nicks, in The Arena, and because i am particularly brain-dead and have to start 'cranking' up the engines, lets launch foolishly into debate.

We shall mimick the rules of debate and state a proposition. Now given my brother's blog, the effective proposition would be "Emotions are an essential tool to life", my brother so eloquently expressed. Well, he just said emotions are tools. But that leaves little room for debate since just about everything can be.

Emotions are nothing more than electrical impulses stimulated by our sensory systems. If we establish that as a definition or common ground for understanding, we can naturally rule out how emotions provide us such tools to life. For circumstances as perceived by the individual are effectively well, individual, one might actually go so far as to think what emotions is perceived by which individual, and if such, does it really prove to be of substantial worth.

Yes of course, in a matter of fight or flight, adrenaline does bring up the feeling of say nervousness, anxiousness, excitement. Thats established by the science advocates. Well, hypothetically, are they ONLY the tool to life? Is there no rationality involved? And lets give a person incapable of rationalising, are emotions going to serve him in the way most adequate to react to a tense situation?

One argument atheists hold in contempt for say, organised religion, is the way the notion of fear is being instilled. Moral imperatives now have no longer a philosophical foundation, but an emotional one: which also means if one actually rationalises such the idea of 'hell' or 'condemnation', and finds no meaning in it, and as a result does not fear it, well... we are effectively approaching the idea of chaos and anarchy arent we? So yes, fear does govern, but if we give it such importance and remark it as a tool to life, we are expressing more than that which is necessary. Emotions are at most, useful.

Now, we are free to redefine and reallocate parameters to the meaning of emotions, since according to wikipedia and its vast resources, 'the term has no single universally accepted definition'.

Nevertheless, emotions serve as part of a social and perhaps cultural construct. A cannibalistic native would probably see and experience murder very different from a say, you. A policeman who witnesses murder probably confronts it alot less non chalantly as from a businessman. Point being, we can generalise and speak about compassion and empathy and passion as "drives", but ultimately its choices, made more often on rational thought and decisive action that makes all the difference.

In fact, given that, we might wanna consider whether emotions have more often than not been a nuisance! What does 'a night of passion' means to you. Does it 'feel' like an emotionally charged, loosely thought out one- night- stand, for the sheer purpose of say...emotional satisfaction? Hell, the meaning of manslaughter effectively means 'murder without malice aforethought', which generally happens in a fit of say, anger? The emotion described so euphemistically as the outburst of truth, just happened to cover that aspect of truth up didnt it? ( Ok, dont get offended man, its for argument's sake and im bored.)

Walk through the thoughts of theologians and theists, and they probably tell you abit about emotions. Then, they would tell you abit about love. And finally, as if out of ostentatiousness, they will tell you the difference between love and emotions. Does a marriage couple 'feel' as much as they did, the way they did ten years before? Perhaps. But perhaps not. Emotions as tools to life??

....................................feel like i can go on. But, am tired. And it leaves room for debate. perhaps in my next post.


Anyway, there's stuff to be done tomo!
1) simlim
2) beach road
3) watch illusionist with mel
4) catechist meeting
5) confession!

ok the numbers are NOT indicative of their priorities. haha. But argh, there's just so much to do.


& about

Marcus
NUS
Human

& loves


link
link
link
link
link
link
link
link
link

& tagboard




& the past

January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011

& CREDITS

layout: + +
fonts: +
brushes: + +
image: +